The Tightrope of Games Journalism

Professional games journalists live their lives trapped between a rock and a hard place.

On the one hand, they have a ethical responsibility to give honest reviews about games for the benefit of their readership.

On the other hand, their wages are paid by game publishers, who sponsor advertising on their websites and in their magazines. Publishers also control access to early previews of games, interviews with the developers and are ultimately provide the content that we, the end users, consume and discuss for hours on end.

As a games journalist, you can’t afford to bite the hand that feeds you, as ex-Gamespot Editorial Director  Jeff Gerstmann discovered when publishing his frank review of Kane & Lynch: Dead Men in 2007. Eidos Interactive had spent a considerable marketing budget on Gamespot to push the game at the time and threatened to pull their advertising money following his rating of 6.0/10. Gerstmann was subsequently fired and forced to sign a non-disparagement agreement.

Recognising that journalists are ultimately beholden to their patron overlords, how can we ever trust professional video games reviews? Indeed Doone asks why this isn’t raised more often.

I think the answer lies in the fact that the proliferation of the internet has lead to far more competition between reviewers. Professional journalists have to work hard to retain their readership, especially with an army of amateur bloggers nipping at their heels.

Readers have no hesitation in voicing their displeasure in the Comments section of articles whenever a journalist is too complimentary, too scathing and, in some cases, plain wrong about something. So whilst I take many of the 0/10 user reviews on Metacritic as ‘noise’, the feedback on mainstream games sites can help to keep everyone honest.

Marketers will always try to influence the dialogue about a title – of this we can be sure. But as long as journalists retain their focus on credibility, I will continue to read their work.

Advertisements

About bernardparsnip

Gamer, Blogger, Poet
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The Tightrope of Games Journalism

  1. I think you raised a good issue, about professional journalists and/or blogs that take up the responsibility of proper, written game reviews. I still believe both kinds of reviews have value. Polls and other Metacritic type sites are great at showing current satisfaction levels. They aren’t so much a rating of the product itself as much as a vote of satisfaction. Both reviews and vote sites play a crucial role in informing consumers.

    There’s also 2 kinds of credibility that really need to be explained. There’s journalist credibility with companies and their credibility with readers. You said it yourself: professional journalists are in fierce competition with others to publish first. And they don’t care if it’s good, informative writing most of the time (just pick up *any* mainstream publication for proof). Then they’re competing with Twitter and Facebook, where comments from companies and celebs are instant hits. They’re already behind on reviewing a product by the time said product is released. This leads to the disparity between their 2 credibilities; these professionals work far harder on their credibility with *companies*. Not readers. If they can show companies that they won’t talk poorly of their products, they’ll get those products before it hits the market, allowing them to get “exclusives” and “features”. They are paid to write something positive. They pay nothing for the products they review.

    This is the ultimate value of independent bloggers and reviewers. I’ll take the opinion of a player any day over professional journalists/publications. They have too much at stake to be honest.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s